<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Site May Harm Your Computer &#038; Your Mind</title>
	<link>http://www.seoimage.com/stardate/this-site-may-harm-your-computer/</link>
	<description>Defining Your Corporate Image on the Web™</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.seoimage.com/stardate/this-site-may-harm-your-computer/#comment-25167</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoimage.com/stardate/this-site-may-harm-your-computer/#comment-25167</guid>
		<description>3/20/08 1 Month + 1 Week later - Still have the Warnings.

I think Stardate is going to move to a new domain soon anyway. This will allow me to be more editorial as well. I cannot imagine that all businesses and blogs are treated like this. Some of us are actually legit sites. 

Perhaps we all need to post about the Top ways to remove a competitor from the SERPs. How do we know that one our our competitors did not exploit our blog as well? C'mon G, how man times do i have to say Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3/20/08 1 Month + 1 Week later - Still have the Warnings.</p>
<p>I think Stardate is going to move to a new domain soon anyway. This will allow me to be more editorial as well. I cannot imagine that all businesses and blogs are treated like this. Some of us are actually legit sites. </p>
<p>Perhaps we all need to post about the Top ways to remove a competitor from the SERPs. How do we know that one our our competitors did not exploit our blog as well? C'mon G, how man times do i have to say Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.seoimage.com/stardate/this-site-may-harm-your-computer/#comment-24457</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoimage.com/stardate/this-site-may-harm-your-computer/#comment-24457</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Timeline:&lt;/strong&gt;
2/12/08 - Received notification from Google  - (Thanks G!)

2/12/08 - Submitted Reinclusion Request after Removing the hacked code. Received an automated response.

3/1/08 - Posted about the hack.

As of this comment date (3/6/08), the site is still unaccessible in Google meaning that this may be the average time line if your website is hacked. 3 Weeks minimum of no Google traffic. No response from the post (unlike other &lt;a href="http://www.seo-scoop.com/2008/01/24/matt-cutts-why-am-i-still-being-punished/" rel="nofollow"&gt;SEO Blogs&lt;/a&gt; - yes, I know this is probably not Matt's Dept, but he did make a big note of it &lt;a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/three-tips-to-protect-your-wordpress-installation/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here (Read This!)&lt;/a&gt;, so &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/06/googe_iframe_piggybacking/" rel="nofollow"&gt;I expect this hack and situation is common&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Timeline:</strong><br />
2/12/08 - Received notification from Google  - (Thanks G!)</p>
<p>2/12/08 - Submitted Reinclusion Request after Removing the hacked code. Received an automated response.</p>
<p>3/1/08 - Posted about the hack.</p>
<p>As of this comment date (3/6/08), the site is still unaccessible in Google meaning that this may be the average time line if your website is hacked. 3 Weeks minimum of no Google traffic. No response from the post (unlike other <a href="http://www.seo-scoop.com/2008/01/24/matt-cutts-why-am-i-still-being-punished/"   rel="nofollow">SEO Blogs</a> - yes, I know this is probably not Matt's Dept, but he did make a big note of it <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/three-tips-to-protect-your-wordpress-installation/"   rel="nofollow">here (Read This!)</a>, so <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/06/googe_iframe_piggybacking/"   rel="nofollow">I expect this hack and situation is common</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
